Re: [BUGFIX]{PATCH] flush icache on ia64 take2
- From: Zoltan Menyhart <Zoltan.Menyhart@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:15:03 +0200
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
But is it too costly that flushing icache page only if a page is newly
installed into the system (PG_arch1) && it is mapped as executable ?
Well it was a bit long time ago, I measured on a Tiger box with
CPUs of 1.3 GHz:
Flushing a page of 64 Kbytes, with modified data in D-cache
(it's slower that not having modified data in the D-cache):
13.1 ... 14.7 usec.
You may have quicker machines, but having more CPUs or a NUMA architecture
can slow it down considerably:
- more CPUs have to agree that that's the moment to carry out a flush
- NUMA adds delay
We may have, say 1 Gbyte / sec local i/o activity (using some RAIDs).
Assume a few % of this 1 Gbyte is the program execution, or program swap in.
It gives some hundreds of new exec pages / sec =>
some msec-s can be lost each sec.
I can agree that it should not be a big deal :-)
I don't want to leak this (stupid) corner case to the file system layer.
Hmm...can't we do clever flushing (like your idea) in VM layer ?
As the VM layer is designed to be independent of the page read in stuff...
Thanks,
Zoltan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [BUGFIX]{PATCH] flush icache on ia64 take2
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
- Re: [BUGFIX]{PATCH] flush icache on ia64 take2
- References:
- [BUGFIX]{PATCH] flush icache on ia64 take2
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
- Re: [BUGFIX]{PATCH] flush icache on ia64 take2
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
- Re: [BUGFIX]{PATCH] flush icache on ia64 take2
- From: Zoltan Menyhart
- Re: [BUGFIX]{PATCH] flush icache on ia64 take2
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
- [BUGFIX]{PATCH] flush icache on ia64 take2
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH for review] [11/48] x86_64: During VM oom condition, kill all threads in process group
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH][IPMI] Fix mem leak in try_init_dmi() code
- Previous by thread: Re: [BUGFIX]{PATCH] flush icache on ia64 take2
- Next by thread: Re: [BUGFIX]{PATCH] flush icache on ia64 take2
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|