Re: [RFC, Announce] Unified x86 architecture, arch/x86
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 08:09:38 +0200
It's not really the same platform: one is PC hardware going back forever
with zillions of bugs, the other is modern PC platforms which much less
bugs and quirks
hehe, I'm seeing a bunch of bugs and quirks appear. It's just that
x86_64 isn't as old as i386 to have as many of them. But give it time.
It will always fundamentally always have less bugs and quirks than i386 because
it's much younger. Modern x86 is significantly different than traditional x86
and in the old days hardware wasn't really tested for the now modern interfaces,
so they tended to have a lot of bugs and quirks.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC, Announce] Unified x86 architecture, arch/x86
- From: Thomas Gleixner
- Re: [RFC, Announce] Unified x86 architecture, arch/x86
- From: Andi Kleen
- Re: [RFC, Announce] Unified x86 architecture, arch/x86
- From: Steven Rostedt
- [RFC, Announce] Unified x86 architecture, arch/x86
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] KVM: MMU: Fix cleaning up the shadow page allocation cache
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] run scripts/Lindent on it to match Documentation/CodingStyle
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC, Announce] Unified x86 architecture, arch/x86
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC, Announce] Unified x86 architecture, arch/x86
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|