Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:40:57 +0200
On 07/25/2007 01:34 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
and the fact is: updatedb discards a considerable portion of the cache completely unnecessarily: on a reasonably complex box no way do all the inodes and dentries fit into all of RAM, so we just trash everything.
Okay, but unless I've now managed to really quite horribly confuse myself, that wouldn't have anything to do with _swap_ prefetch would it?
Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- References:
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Nick Piggin
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Ray Lee
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Nick Piggin
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Rene Herman
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: david
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Rene Herman
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Rene Herman
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Rene Herman
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Prev by Date: Re: TSC calibration sometimes not correct with RT patch.
- Next by Date: Re: modpost warning question
- Previous by thread: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Next by thread: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|