Re: 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found...
- From: Xudong Guan <xudong.guan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:26:04 +0100
On 08:19(-0700) Thu 26 Jul, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
What distro/version of grub are you running? I'm wondering if there are
some old version of grub out there which did the "load four sectors"
way-anciently-obsolete crap; the other possibility that comes to mind is
setting up the stack in an invalid manner
My grub screen shows "GRUB version 0.91". I am playing with a qemu
image with this version of grub came from an old Damn Small Linux distribution.
Xudong
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found...
- From: H. Peter Anvin
- Re: 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found...
- References:
- 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found...
- From: Borislav Petkov
- Re: 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found...
- From: Xudong Guan
- Re: 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found...
- From: H. Peter Anvin
- 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found...
- Prev by Date: Re: [GIT PULL] Bug- and documentation fixes for the x86 setup code
- Next by Date: sk98lin for 2.6.23-rc1
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found...
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|