Re: 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found...



Borislav Petkov wrote:

What distro/version of grub are you running?
Debian unstable
I'm wondering if there are
some old version of grub out there which did the "load four sectors"
way-anciently-obsolete crap; the other possibility that comes to mind is
setting up the stack in an invalid manner.
grub version:

[boris@gollum:18:17:27:-> apt-cache show grub
Package: grub
Priority: optional
Section: admin
Installed-Size: 708
Maintainer: Grub Maintainers <pkg-grub-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Architecture: i386
Version: 0.97-29
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.5-5), libncurses5 (>= 5.4-5)
Suggests: grub-doc, mdadm
Filename: pool/main/g/grub/grub_0.97-29_i386.deb
Size: 366884
MD5sum: 2da7a5942db06eaba046dff4615bcce9
SHA1: 7f4da793da209d011ce94fceebaebe0e5f08790f
SHA256: 2596782c08f1f7365e9935f687fef74c67d8702503188f22448db9f0ac98e18e
Description: GRand Unified Bootloader
...

This concerns me deeply. This is a current version of Grub which
shouldn't have any silly 8K limitations. Yet it appears to have a
similar pathology over the ancient version Xudong just described.

The absolute best would be if we could replicate this in simulation
(Bochs or Qemu); this would make it very simple to debug. Would you be
willing to try to do that?

-hpa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Hunters Visitor (c:
    ... capable of getting it out of my mind? ... I have another shot of it eating a grub or something it snorfed up ...
    (rec.equestrian)
  • Re: WinXP
    ... Duuu. ... Not sure how I thought you all would read my mind. ... Grub did the boot work. ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)
  • Re: 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found...
    ... some old version of grub out there which did the "load four sectors" ... way-anciently-obsolete crap; the other possibility that comes to mind is ... My grub screen shows "GRUB version 0.91". ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: swsusp: cannot find swap device - or is it an ACPI error?
    ... Never mind, seems that I needed to add the resume=/dev/sda10 to the ... kernel line of grub. ... the resume=/dev/sda10 parameter in the defoptions doesn't seem to be ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Re: 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found...
    ... some old version of grub out there which did the "load four sectors" ... way-anciently-obsolete crap; the other possibility that comes to mind is ... My grub screen shows "GRUB version 0.91". ...
    (Linux-Kernel)