Re: 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found...
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:12:09 -0700
Borislav Petkov wrote:
What distro/version of grub are you running?Debian unstable
I'm wondering if there aregrub version:
some old version of grub out there which did the "load four sectors"
way-anciently-obsolete crap; the other possibility that comes to mind is
setting up the stack in an invalid manner.
[boris@gollum:18:17:27:-> apt-cache show grub
Package: grub
Priority: optional
Section: admin
Installed-Size: 708
Maintainer: Grub Maintainers <pkg-grub-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Architecture: i386
Version: 0.97-29
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.5-5), libncurses5 (>= 5.4-5)
Suggests: grub-doc, mdadm
Filename: pool/main/g/grub/grub_0.97-29_i386.deb
Size: 366884
MD5sum: 2da7a5942db06eaba046dff4615bcce9
SHA1: 7f4da793da209d011ce94fceebaebe0e5f08790f
SHA256: 2596782c08f1f7365e9935f687fef74c67d8702503188f22448db9f0ac98e18e
Description: GRand Unified Bootloader
...
This concerns me deeply. This is a current version of Grub which
shouldn't have any silly 8K limitations. Yet it appears to have a
similar pathology over the ancient version Xudong just described.
The absolute best would be if we could replicate this in simulation
(Bochs or Qemu); this would make it very simple to debug. Would you be
willing to try to do that?
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found...
- From: Borislav Petkov
- Re: 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found...
- References:
- 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found...
- From: Borislav Petkov
- Re: 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found...
- From: Xudong Guan
- Re: 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found...
- From: H. Peter Anvin
- Re: 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found...
- From: Borislav Petkov
- 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found...
- Prev by Date: Re: [bug] SLUB & freeing locks [was: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches]
- Next by Date: Re: [ck] Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found...
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|