Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm2



On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 03:58:48AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 8/1/07, Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 11:09:32PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
- Is anyone testing the kgdb code in here?

Testing, yes. Succeeding, no. It's utterly hosed on SH in its present
condition at least. Presumably it's been tested on at least one platform
with some measure of success, but it's certainly not mine ;-)

does kgdb actually have a chance to get merged ? with the history of
it, i just assumed it was never going in, so we've been using our own
kgdb patch on Blackfin ... so the version *we have* works great :) but
if there's a chance of this actually going mainline, we can see about
testing that version as well ...

The generic code has a better chance of being merged if it actually works
at least and doesn't break every platform out there that has an existing
stub. It offers quite a bit of new functionality and does clean things up
a bit, so it would certainly be nice to get things to use that, rather
than having to duplicate all of this crap in the architectures. If it's
not going to be merged, everyone will of course continue using the
existing in-tree stubs (sh, ppc, etc.).

It's generally advantageous to get these things working on your
architecture _before_ things are merged however, as it's one less thing
to catch up on after the fact. It also helps to figure out if there are
issues with the current implementation by trying it out on your platform
in advance, it's a lot more work to push back against it once it's
already merged.

The fact that no one has bothered to even compile for the platforms the
generic kgdb stuff is ported to does seem to suggest that the kgdb folks
aren't terribly serious about getting it merged, though.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Relevant Pages

  • Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm2
    ... Presumably it's been tested on at least one platform ... the sh-lite.patch which is part of the kgdb git tree explicitly says that the sh-sci.c needs to be "re-ported". ... The same was true of IA64 at first, but Bob Pico submitted some further patches and IA64 is should compile build and work with kgdb. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Excel-based Front End Reporting Tool
    ... the architectures handle this differently. ... > Microsoft Analysis Services based management information solution at my ... > There is no reason to be on any other platform other than an Microsoft ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.olap)
  • Re: Apples poor positioning for the age *after* x86
    ... features, but they work with the new DirectX. ... They did it because it is far too hard to switch. ... They realized the only way to achieve platform independence was to develop a software platform for the lowest common denominator. ... on the off chance that you might need to switch CPU architectures? ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: UrhG
    ... Wenn ein Mensch gleichen Hobbies die Platform aufsucht, findet er dort unsere früher definierten Ziele und wird damit vielleicht verleitet, diesem Verein beizutreten. ... Was bleibt, ist ein schlechter Ruf und die gute Chance darauf, dass es sich in der Hobby-Branche schneller ´rumspricht, als mir lieb sein kann. ...
    (de.soc.recht.misc)
  • Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm2
    ... Succeeding, no. ... Presumably it's been tested on at least one platform ... kgdb patch on Blackfin ... ... if there's a chance of this actually going mainline, ...
    (Linux-Kernel)