Re: [RFC 04/10] Temporary struct vfs_lookup in file_permission
- From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 20:56:20 +0200
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 19:58, Josef Sipek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 07:16:26PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
Create a temporary struct vfs_lookup in file_permission() instead of
passing a NULL value.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <ag@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/namei.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -292,14 +292,15 @@ int vfs_permission(struct vfs_lookup *lo
*
* Used to check for read/write/execute permissions on an already opened
* file.
- *
- * Note:
- * Do not use this function in new code. All access checks should
- * be done using vfs_permission().
Should this comment be removed?
IMO yes. If vfs_permission() works for a piece of code it's the obvious
preference. If on the other hand you really need to check permissions on a
file, then why not use this function?
*/
int file_permission(struct file *file, int mask)
{
- return permission(file->f_path.dentry->d_inode, mask, NULL);
+ struct vfs_lookup lookup;
+
+ lookup.path = file->f_path;
+ lookup.flags = 0;
I tend to find this little bit cleaner:
struct vfs_lookup lookup = {
.path = file->f_path,
.flags = 0,
};
I didn't use initializers because they initialize the entire data structure.
In case of struct vfs_lookup, unless the LOOKUP_OPEN flag is set, then the
open_intent doesn't need initialization. We could use a DEFINE_... macro; not
sure this would improve anything though.
+
+ return permission(file->f_path.dentry->d_inode, mask, &lookup);
}
/*
Thanks,
Andreas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC 00/10] Split up struct nameidata (take 3)
- From: Andreas Gruenbacher
- [RFC 04/10] Temporary struct vfs_lookup in file_permission
- From: Andreas Gruenbacher
- Re: [RFC 04/10] Temporary struct vfs_lookup in file_permission
- From: Josef Sipek
- [RFC 00/10] Split up struct nameidata (take 3)
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm: slub: add knowledge of reserve pages
- Next by Date: Re: Disk spin down issue on shut down/suspend to disk
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC 04/10] Temporary struct vfs_lookup in file_permission
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC 04/10] Temporary struct vfs_lookup in file_permission
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|