Re: Panic with XFS on RHEL5 (2.6.18-8.1.8.el5)



Chris Boot <bootc@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

Måns Rullgård wrote:
Chris Boot <chris.boot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:


All,

I've got a box running RHEL5 and haven't been impressed by ext3
performance on it (running of a 1.5TB HP MSA20 using the cciss
driver). I compiled XFS as a module and tried it out since I'm used to
using it on Debian, which runs much more efficiently. However, every
so often the kernel panics as below. Apologies for the tainted kernel,
but we run VMware Server on the box as well.

Does anyone have any hits/tips for using XFS on Red Hat? What's
causing the panic below, and is there a way around this?

BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address b8af9d60
printing eip:
c0415974
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0000 [#1]
SMP last sysfs file: /block/loop7/dev
[...]
[<f936884e>] xfsbufd_wakeup+0x28/0x49 [xfs]
[<c04572f9>] shrink_slab+0x56/0x13c
[<c0457c0c>] try_to_free_pages+0x162/0x23e
[<c0454064>] __alloc_pages+0x18d/0x27e
[<c045214e>] find_or_create_page+0x53/0x8c
[<c046c7b1>] __getblk+0x162/0x270
[<c0475be0>] do_lookup+0x53/0x157
[<f889138f>] ext3_getblk+0x7c/0x233 [ext3]
[<f88913fe>] ext3_getblk+0xeb/0x233 [ext3]
[<c048215c>] mntput_no_expire+0x11/0x6a
[<f889226e>] ext3_bread+0x13/0x69 [ext3]
[<f8895606>] htree_dirblock_to_tree+0x22/0x113 [ext3]
[<f889574f>] ext3_htree_fill_tree+0x58/0x1a0 [ext3]
[<c047828b>] do_path_lookup+0x20e/0x25f
[<c046b987>] get_empty_filp+0x99/0x15e
[<f889d611>] ext3_permission+0x0/0xa [ext3]
[<f888eaa3>] ext3_readdir+0x1ce/0x59b [ext3]
[<c047a0dd>] filldir+0x0/0xb9
[<c0472973>] sys_fstat64+0x1e/0x23
[<c047a1f9>] vfs_readdir+0x63/0x8d
[<c047a0dd>] filldir+0x0/0xb9
[<c047a447>] sys_getdents+0x5f/0x9c
[<c0403eff>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
=======================


Your Redhat kernel is probably built with 4k stacks and XFS+loop+ext3
seems to be enough to overflow it.

Thanks, that explains a lot. However, I don't have any XFS filesystems
mounted over loop devices on ext3. Earlier in the day I had iso9660 on
loop on xfs, could that have caused the issue? It was unmounted and
deleted when this panic occurred.

The mention of /block/loop7/dev and the presence both XFS and ext3
function in the call stack suggested to me that you might have an ext3
filesystem in a loop device on XFS. I see no other explanation for
that call stack other than a stack overflow, but then we're still back
at the same root cause.

Are you using device-mapper and/or md? They too are known to blow 4k
stacks when used with XFS.

I'll probably just try and recompile the kernel with 8k stacks and see
how it goes. Screw the support, we're unlikely to get it anyway. :-P

Please report how this works out.

--
Måns Rullgård
mans@xxxxxxxxx

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Panic with XFS on RHEL5 (2.6.18-8.1.8.el5)
    ... I've got a box running RHEL5 and haven't been impressed by ext3 ... so often the kernel panics as below. ... Does anyone have any hits/tips for using XFS on Red Hat? ... I don't have any XFS filesystems mounted over loop devices on ext3. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: XFS Filesystem problem
    ... What hardware and kernel are you using for XFS and what sort of I/O loads ... Is there a reason you can't use ext3? ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: x86: 4kstacks default
    ... XFS is unique here; imagine the whole stacking thing on x86-64 ... Beause it means the stack overflow happens ... writeout policy and ondisk allocation strategies. ... random places in the kernel seems to be quite a complicated thing to do ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: which to use: ext3, JFS, XFS, ReiserFS?
    ... debian-administration touts XFS as the best in performance. ... by UNIX ffs (fast filesystem) with decades of history. ... months ago when we heard from the Debian maintainer for the JFS utils ... I changed back to ext3. ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: ReiseFS vs XFS
    ... > installation of the Debian system with XFS. ... ReiserFS is faster than ext3 ONLY for files under 4kB. ... would use the ext3 filesystem. ...
    (Debian-User)