Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt
- From: Zachary Amsden <zach@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:16:16 -0700
Avi Kivity wrote:
Since this is only for newer kernels, won't updating the driver to use a hypercall be more efficient? Or is this for existing out-of-tree drivers?
Actually, it is for in-tree drivers that we emulate but don't want to pollute, and one out of tree driver (that will hopefully be in tree soon!) that has no way to determine if making hypercalls is acceptable.
Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt
- From: Zachary Amsden
- Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt
- From: Avi Kivity
- Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt
- From: Zachary Amsden
- Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt
- From: Avi Kivity
- [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt
- Prev by Date: Re: [BUG] 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 Kernel panic - not syncing: DMA: Memory would be corrupted
- Next by Date: Re: Problems with IDE on linux 2.6.22.X
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt
- Index(es):