Re: [RFC 0/7] Postphone reclaim laundry to write at high water marks
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:08:28 +0200
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 12:09:03AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Strictly speaking:
if:
page = alloc_page(gfp);
fails but:
obj = kmem_cache_alloc(s, gfp);
succeeds then its a bug.
Why? this is like saying that if alloc_pages(order=1) fails but
alloc_pages(order=0) succeeds then it's a bug. Obviously it's not a
bug.
The only bug is if slab allocations <=4k fails despite
alloc_pages(order=0) would succeed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC 0/7] Postphone reclaim laundry to write at high water marks
- From: Peter Zijlstra
- Re: [RFC 0/7] Postphone reclaim laundry to write at high water marks
- References:
- [RFC 0/7] Postphone reclaim laundry to write at high water marks
- From: Christoph Lameter
- Re: [RFC 0/7] Postphone reclaim laundry to write at high water marks
- From: Peter Zijlstra
- Re: [RFC 0/7] Postphone reclaim laundry to write at high water marks
- From: Christoph Lameter
- Re: [RFC 0/7] Postphone reclaim laundry to write at high water marks
- From: Peter Zijlstra
- Re: [RFC 0/7] Postphone reclaim laundry to write at high water marks
- From: Christoph Lameter
- Re: [RFC 0/7] Postphone reclaim laundry to write at high water marks
- From: Peter Zijlstra
- [RFC 0/7] Postphone reclaim laundry to write at high water marks
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.23-rc3-mm1
- Next by Date: Re: request for Linux kernel related project ideas
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC 0/7] Postphone reclaim laundry to write at high water marks
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC 0/7] Postphone reclaim laundry to write at high water marks
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|