Re: Understanding I/O behaviour - next try
- From: Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
--- Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 08/28/2007 11:53 AM, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
DL380
The basic setup is a dual x86_64 box with 8 GB of memory. The
has a HW RAID5, made from 4x72GB disks and about 100 MB writecache.
The performance of the block device with O_DIRECT is about 90MB/sec.
through
The problematic behaviour comes when we are moving large files
the system. The file usage in this case is mostly "use once" orGB, we
streaming. As soon as the amount of file data is larger than 7.5
see occasional unresponsiveness of the system (e.g. no more sshand
connections into the box) of more than 1 or 2 minutes (!) duration
(kernels up to 2.6.19). Load goes up, mainly due to pdflush threads
some other poor guys being in "D" state.
Try booting with "mem=4096M", "mem=2048M", ...
hmm. I tried 1024M a while ago and IIRC did not see a lot [any]
difference. But as it is no big deal, I will repeat it tomorrow.
Just curious - what are you expecting? Why should it help?
Thanks
Martin
------------------------------------------------------
Martin Knoblauch
email: k n o b i AT knobisoft DOT de
www: http://www.knobisoft.de
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: Understanding I/O behaviour - next try
- From: Chuck Ebbert
- Re: Understanding I/O behaviour - next try
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] Override 80-wire cable detection for Toshiba S1800-814
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Use task_pid_nr() in ip_vs_sync.c
- Previous by thread: Re: Understanding I/O behaviour - next try
- Next by thread: Re: Understanding I/O behaviour - next try
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|