Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:29:05 +0200 (CEST)
On Aug 31 2007 14:06, Jeff Garzik wrote:
something like BROKEN, though, has *nothing* to do with maturity. a
feature can be any of those maturity levels, and simultaneously be
BROKEN. i consider BROKEN to be what i call a "status", and different
status levels might be the default of normal, or KIND_OF_FLAKY or
TOTALLY_BORKED -- that's where BROKEN would fit in.
BROKEN is definitely a maturity level. A more accurate description would be
BITROTTING perhaps. The code in question has passed through bleeding ->
experimental -> stable, and come out the other side.
Software is quite unlike the art of medicine. There, you would go from
'stable' to 'broken', then someone 'experiments' with you, and if
it's a bad day, you bleed out. :)
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- From: Randy Dunlap
- Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- From: Robert P. J. Day
- Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- From: Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Starting point for deprecating "ether=" boot time option.
- Next by Date: RE: recent nfs change causes autofs regression
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|