Re: possible build system oddity
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:50:51 +0200 (CEST)
On Aug 31 2007 11:00, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
It seems you are confused by the fact that this recompilation results in
several relinks (LD)?
Or something else changed that he didn't realize. Just the other day, I
applied a one-line patch that hit one .c file, and *the entire kernel*
started rebuilding.
Took me a while to figure out that I'd been looking for something else, and
done a 'vi Makefile' in the top level, and exited with 'ZZ' rather than ':q' ;)
Changing the top makefile (where your version info is) should only
result in rebuilding the .mod.c, .mod.o and .ko files.
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- possible build system oddity
- From: Oliver Neukum
- Re: possible build system oddity
- From: Adrian Bunk
- Re: possible build system oddity
- From: Valdis . Kletnieks
- possible build system oddity
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix discrepancy between VDSO based gettimeofday() and sys_gettimeofday().
- Next by Date: [PATCH 0/6] Use one zonelist per node instead of multiple zonelists v5
- Previous by thread: Re: possible build system oddity
- Next by thread: [PATCH] H8/300: Fix misnamed "CONFIG_BLKDEV_RESERVE_ADDRESS" Kconfig variable.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
