Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing



On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 03:00:46PM +0200, Igor Sobrado wrote:
Not strictly true. They can either agree to a change and issue one or
they can convey to other parties the right to change the terms. The GPL
for example does this for version selection.

So, under a dual-licensed BSD/GPL code the latter license allows a
developer to remove the GPL license itself and release a single-licensed
BSD code if other parties want to do it?

Exactly. That's what dual-licensing is.

[quote]
This is no different from the fact that we have some drivers that are
GPLv2/BSD licensed. Within the kernel, they are GPLv2. But on their own,
you can choose to use them under the BSD license, make your changes to
them, and release them commercially.
And correct - I cannot (and neither can anybody else) then accept those
*non*GPLv2 changes back.
[end quote]

That's from Linus and quite recently.

FWIW, it's damn hard to codify "... and changes to this code should not
change the situation". It's certainly a very good policy and in this
case it's the only sane policy.

[quote]
Actually, normally I *do* have such a trust. It's why I have no problem
with drivers that are dual-GPL/BSD, and in fact, I've told people that I
don't want them to turn them into GPL-only, because that is simply not
polite.
[end quote]

Same posting from Linus. And that's much more relevant to shooting the patch
in question down (and IMO it ought to be shot down) than references to
legality.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Relevant Pages

  • Re: A fucking bunch of lying pussies
    ... >>you cannot have freeware sections integrated in a GPL program, ... I gave you a quote from the GPL license that states that the two ... Umm it was your quote I was commenting on, ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: that old GNU/Linux argument
    ... Yet another meaningless pseudo-analogy representing free ... If the information cannot be moved, how come the wireless drivers built with BSD license in OpenBSD by Theo de Raadt were moved to GPL license. ... <quote http://kerneltrap.org/OpenBSD/Stealing_Versus_Sharing_Code> ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: scope of linux in the corporates...
    ... Please just reconcile this one quote: ... acquire, install, use, inspect, or even experimentally modify ... You are not required to accept this License, ... Moglen says you can modify GPL'd software without accepting the GPL. ...
    (comp.os.linux.development.apps)
  • [PATCH] change libata license from OSL+GPL to GPL
    ... - changes license of all code from OSL+GPL to plain ole GPL ... indicate your decision by deleting the provisions above and ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Copyleft and embedded Forth
    ... rights of another. ... Developer may do with p.d. ... Use isn't an issue with any free software license. ... You have to choose to use GPL software. ...
    (comp.lang.forth)