Re: udev: Inconsistency between %b and %p?
- From: Manuel Reimer <Manuel.Spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 23:05:24 +0200
Andreas Schwab wrote:
As I would prefer to use the USB device information (idVendor, idProduct)
to detect the device, I also tried this one:
ATTRS{idVendor}=="0dda", ATTRS{idProduct}=="2005", SUBSYSTEM=="scsi",
ACTION=="add", PROGRAM+="/usr/bin/test.sh %b %p"
Now this version returns the USB device ID ($NUM-$NUM) to the test script,
but the device path (%p) is still OK and still goes down up to the SCSI
device ID.
Why does %b not return the SCSI device ID in the second rule?
Because ATTRS has matched the USB device, not the SCSI device.
Yes, that's right, but "SUBSYSTEM" matched the SCSI device...
If I use udevinfo, then this tool tells me:
| A rule to match, can be composed by the attributes of the device
| and the attributes from one single parent device.
So I thought, that I've matched the SCSI device now. To prove this, I just replaced "SUBSYSTEM=="scsi"" with "SUBSYSTEM=="usb"" and removed the "S" in the "ATTRS" of the above rule, and now, I get the USB-device in %b (as expected) and the path in %p only goes down up to the USB device ID.
So, if all rules match for the same device, then %b and %p are both pointing to this, right, device.
If I try to match, using one of the parent devices (using the "S" "extension" to the property names) and the device, to match to, itself, then the two are inconsistent. Then, %b holds the device name of the parent and %p holds the patch of the device, I want to match.
For me, this looks like a bug, or am I wrong?
Yours
Manuel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: udev: Inconsistency between %b and %p?
- From: Kay Sievers
- Re: udev: Inconsistency between %b and %p?
- From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: udev: Inconsistency between %b and %p?
- References:
- udev: Inconsistency between %b and %p?
- From: Manuel Reimer
- Re: udev: Inconsistency between %b and %p?
- From: Andreas Schwab
- udev: Inconsistency between %b and %p?
- Prev by Date: Re: Problem to recognize that the file system is full
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/3] build system: section garbage collection for vmlinux
- Previous by thread: Re: udev: Inconsistency between %b and %p?
- Next by thread: Re: udev: Inconsistency between %b and %p?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading