Re: hda_intel : Patch + Regression in 2.6.18 -> 2.6.22
- From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 12:21:36 +0200
At Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:22:27 +0200,
Romano Giannetti wrote:
Takashi: good news!
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 23:48 +0200, Romano Giannetti wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 17:25 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:09:50 +0200,
Romano Giannetti wrote:
Just one hand up: I haven't tested the patch pointed to by Andrew, will
do asap, but it seems that contains the changes from
https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=3104
which are needed to have sound at all on my toshiba (although with some
remaining problems).
No, it's a different one. This Toshiba model is still not supported
well. The patch in mm tree is basically equivalent with the latest
ALSA HG tree, so if you tested ALSA HG version (or daily snapshot),
it should be same.
Unfortunately you're right. The patch I posted to the alsa bugtrack,
extracted from the pshou files, works for me. The alsa-git patch gives
me a system without sound.
I stand corrected: by loading snd-hda-intel with model=toshiba sound
works (output and input) with my toshiba A305. So, I think that the only
patch needed to make it works out of the box on top of current alsa-git
is:
diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c b/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c
index 3557865..496d119 100644
--- a/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c
+++ b/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c
@@ -9044,6 +9044,7 @@ static const char *alc268_models[ALC268_MODEL_LAST] = {
static struct snd_pci_quirk alc268_cfg_tbl[] = {
SND_PCI_QUIRK(0x1043, 0x1205, "ASUS W7J", ALC268_3ST),
SND_PCI_QUIRK(0x1179, 0xff10, "TOSHIBA A205", ALC268_TOSHIBA),
+ SND_PCI_QUIRK(0x1179, 0xff50, "TOSHIBA A305", ALC268_TOSHIBA),
SND_PCI_QUIRK(0x103c, 0x30cc, "TOSHIBA", ALC268_TOSHIBA),
SND_PCI_QUIRK(0x1025, 0x0126, "Acer", ALC268_ACER),
SND_PCI_QUIRK(0x1025, 0x0130, "Acer Extensa 5210", ALC268_ACER),
Ah good. I added it to ALSA HG tree now.
Thanks!
Takashi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: hda_intel : Patch + Regression in 2.6.18 -> 2.6.22
- From: Andrew Morton
- Re: hda_intel : Patch + Regression in 2.6.18 -> 2.6.22
- From: Takashi Iwai
- Re: hda_intel : Patch + Regression in 2.6.18 -> 2.6.22
- From: Andrew Morton
- Re: hda_intel : Patch + Regression in 2.6.18 -> 2.6.22
- From: Takashi Iwai
- Re: hda_intel : Patch + Regression in 2.6.18 -> 2.6.22
- From: Romano Giannetti
- Re: hda_intel : Patch + Regression in 2.6.18 -> 2.6.22
- From: Takashi Iwai
- Re: hda_intel : Patch + Regression in 2.6.18 -> 2.6.22
- From: Romano Giannetti
- Re: hda_intel : Patch + Regression in 2.6.18 -> 2.6.22
- From: Romano Giannetti
- Re: hda_intel : Patch + Regression in 2.6.18 -> 2.6.22
- Prev by Date: [BUG] 2.6.23-rc5 kernel BUG at fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c:945
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 06/10] Text Edit Lock - kprobes architecture independent support
- Previous by thread: Re: hda_intel : Patch + Regression in 2.6.18 -> 2.6.22
- Next by thread: easy alsa patches for the stable kernel? (was: Re: hda_intel : Patch + Regression in 2.6.18 -> 2.6.22)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|