Re: [ofa-general] InfiniBand/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.24
- From: "Michael Chan" <mchan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:59:18 -0700
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 14:11 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
I've been meaning to track down the bnx2 iscsi offload patch to look
and see if this issue is addressed, since the same problem seems to
exist: it seems an iscsi connection and a main stack tcp connection
might share the same 4-tuple unless something is done to avoid that
happening.
iSCSI does not do passive listens, only active connections to the
target. But you're right, the port space is still shared between iSCSI
and the main stack. We currently rely on user apps binding to the main
stack to reserve certain ephemeral ports, and telling the iSCSI driver
which ports to use.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ofa-general] InfiniBand/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.24
- From: Roland Dreier
- Re: [ofa-general] InfiniBand/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.24
- References:
- InfiniBand/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.24
- From: Roland Dreier
- Re: [ofa-general] InfiniBand/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.24
- From: Steve Wise
- Re: [ofa-general] InfiniBand/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.24
- From: Roland Dreier
- InfiniBand/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.24
- Prev by Date: Re: RFC: bug in load_elf_binary?
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] v4l: Build error with et61x251, if V4L1_COMPAT is not selected
- Previous by thread: Re: [ofa-general] InfiniBand/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.24
- Next by thread: Re: [ofa-general] InfiniBand/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.24
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|