Re: [PATCH] binfmt_flat: minimum support for theBlackfin relocations
- From: David McCullough <David_Mccullough@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:32:16 +1000
Jivin Robin Getz lays it down ...
On Thu 20 Sep 2007 11:03, David McCullough pondered:
I would say that (a) is definately not the case. I am sure the BF guys
will say they have been banging us on the head with changes for a long
time and getting no where as we considered the changes to severe or out
of line.
I don't think we have been "banging heads" with you (unless that is your
feeling?) - how about "working together, but diverting to satisfy different
needs" :)
No head banging feelings here, but I would understand if you guys felt
that way occasionally ;-) I obviously forgot the happy face on that
statement. It was meant as a good thing.
I think that we have had more issues in the uClinux-dist (userspace and build
environment), but for kernel code, we have moved from some non-standard
(stupid) things we were doing early on to what we have today - which is as
common/standard with other archs as we can be.
Although this is slightly off topic - on the uClinux distribution side - most
of our changes are based on requirements/desires from being able to support
fdpic elf and flat formats, and to attempt to make things easier for end
users/us to use/maintain. Where we do make changes - we always send the patch
upstream and have the conversation with you (not everyone else does this),
and some/most times rework things so they are more acceptable to you. We
don't always come to an agreement - but we always have the discussion, and
are willing to move if we can make things better that still meets both our
needs/desires.
This particular patch was trivial in comparison to others I've seen,
That is what we thought.
it fixed all the existing arches (not something that is always done) and
seemed a reasonable start to finally get the BF guys up and running.
Still, happy to make it better of course ;-)
As always - we are more than happy to explore/review alternative patches if
people want to write/sumbit them.
Cheers,
Davidm
--
David McCullough, david_mccullough@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ph:+61 734352815
Secure Computing - SnapGear http://www.uCdot.org http://www.cyberguard.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH] binfmt_flat: minimum support for the Blackfin relocations
- From: Bryan Wu
- Re: [PATCH] binfmt_flat: minimum support for theBlackfin relocations
- From: Paul Mundt
- Re: [PATCH] binfmt_flat: minimum support for theBlackfin relocations
- From: David McCullough
- Re: [PATCH] binfmt_flat: minimum support for theBlackfin relocations
- From: Robin Getz
- [PATCH] binfmt_flat: minimum support for the Blackfin relocations
- Prev by Date: Re: [git] CFS-devel, group scheduler, fixes
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2 -mm] kexec based hibernation -v3: kexec jump
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] binfmt_flat: minimum support for theBlackfin relocations
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] binfmt_flat: minimum support for theBlackfin relocations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|