Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes
- From: Oleg Verych <olecom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 03:20:07 +0200
* Sat, 22 Sep 2007 15:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
As i never had any suspend working ever, let me point this LKML post
http://mid.gmane.org/200709221746.14429.mihai.dontu@xxxxxxxxx
from Mihal, who just managed to do some other magic in sligtly
different context (maybe yet another anti "ACPI screwed up").
Mihai, you can find whole thread by above URL, requesting message-ids
from in-reply-to or references headers of this message.
_____
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes
- From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes
- References:
- [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes
- From: Thomas Gleixner
- Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes
- From: Linus Torvalds
- [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API
- Next by Date: Re: Should parent's WIFSIGNALED(siginfo->si_status) be true EVEN IF the SIGNAL was caught by the child?
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes
- Index(es):