Re: [patch] fix sys_mknodat breakage from r/o bind mounts
- From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:13:45 -0700
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 00:58 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
mknod("foo", 0644) returns EINVAL, even though it should succeed.
Just to clarify, this is for when we use mknod to create normal,
non-device files, right? Your fix looks very correct to me.
I'm curious, do you have a normal program that uses mknod(2) this way?
I'd like to add it to my test scripts.
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <haveblue@xxxxxxxxxx>
-- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] fix sys_mknodat breakage from r/o bind mounts
- From: Miklos Szeredi
- Re: [patch] fix sys_mknodat breakage from r/o bind mounts
- References:
- [patch] fix sys_mknodat breakage from r/o bind mounts
- From: Miklos Szeredi
- [patch] fix sys_mknodat breakage from r/o bind mounts
- Prev by Date: Re: subsystem_unregister() breakage in -mm
- Next by Date: missing mnt_drop_write() on open error
- Previous by thread: [patch] fix sys_mknodat breakage from r/o bind mounts
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] fix sys_mknodat breakage from r/o bind mounts
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
