Re: 2.6.21 -> 2.6.22 & 2.6.23-rc8 performance regression
- From: "Denys" <nuclearcat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:45:47 +0300
Hi
pi ~ # zcat /proc/config.gz |grep SLUB
# CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_SLUB=y
21:27:20 CPU %user %nice %sys %iowait %irq %soft %steal
%idle intr/s
21:27:21 all 5.53 21.61 8.54 0.00 0.50 5.03 0.00
58.79 7147.52
21:27:22 all 6.40 15.76 8.87 0.00 0.49 20.20 0.00
48.28 6327.00
21:27:23 all 6.53 20.60 12.06 0.00 0.00 52.76 0.00
8.04 456.44
21:27:24 all 7.00 17.50 10.50 0.00 0.00 53.00 0.00
12.00 439.00
21:27:25 all 7.50 18.00 12.50 0.50 0.50 52.50 0.00
8.50 464.00
21:27:26 all 6.64 16.11 11.37 0.00 0.00 58.77 0.00
7.11 401.90
21:27:27 all 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.00 0.00 99.20 0.00
0.00 325.20
21:27:28 all 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.50 0.00
0.00 453.47
21:27:29 all 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00
0.00 495.10
21:27:30 all 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.50 0.00
0.00 625.74
21:27:31 all 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00
0.00 600.97
21:27:32 all 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00
0.00 604.95
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=0.031 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=229 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=253 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=257 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=279 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=20 ttl=64 time=246 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=21 ttl=64 time=246 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=22 ttl=64 time=234 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=23 ttl=64 time=235 ms
Problem remains. It is another server.
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:48:44 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote
application)I've moved recently one of my proxies(squid and some compressing
likefrom 2.6.21 to 2.6.22, and notice huge performance drop. I think this is
important, cause it can cause serious regression on some other workloads
traffic,busy web-servers and etc.
After some analysis of different options i can bring more exact numbers:
2.6.21 able to process 500-550 requests/second and 15-20 Mbit/s of
sshand working great without any slowdown or instability.
2.6.22 able to process only 250-300 requests and 8-10 Mbit/s of traffic,
configuration(smalland console is "freezing" (there is delay even for typing characters).
Both proxies is on identical hardware(Sun Fire X4100),
it tosystem, LFS-like, on USB flash), different only kernel.
I tried to disable/enable various options and optimisations - it doesn't
change anything, till i reach SLUB/SLAB option.
I've loaded proxy configuration to gentoo PC with 2.6.22 (then upgraded
slowdown,2.6.23-rc8), and having same effect.
Additionally, when load reaching maximum i can notice whole system
forfor example ssh and scp takes much more time to run, even i do nice -n -5
surethem.
But even choosing 2.6.23-rc8+SLAB i noticed same "freezing" of ssh (and
withit slowdown other kind of network performance), but much less comparing
ksoftirqd/0,SLUB. On top i am seeing ksoftirqd taking almost 100% (sometimes
butsometimes ksoftirqd/1).
I tried also different tricks with scheduler (/proc/sys/kernel/sched*),
unitit's also didn't help.
When it freezes it looks like:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
7 root 15 -5 0 0 0 R 64 0.0 2:47.48 ksoftirqd/1
5819 root 20 0 134m 130m 596 R 57 3.3 4:36.78 globax
5911 squid 20 0 1138m 1.1g 2124 R 26 28.9 2:24.87 squid
10 root 15 -5 0 0 0 S 1 0.0 0:01.86 events/1
6130 root 20 0 3960 2416 1592 S 0 0.1 0:08.02 oprofiled
Oprofile results:
Thats oprofile with 2.6.23-rc8 - SLUB
73918 21.5521 check_bytes
38361 11.1848 acpi_pm_read
14077 4.1044 init_object
13632 3.9747 ip_send_reply
8486 2.4742 __slab_alloc
7199 2.0990 nf_iterate
6718 1.9588 page_address
6716 1.9582 tcp_v4_rcv
6425 1.8733 __slab_free
5604 1.6339 on_freelist
Thats oprofile with 2.6.23-rc8 - SLAB
CPU: AMD64 processors, speed 2592.64 MHz (estimated)
Counted CPU_CLK_UNHALTED events (Cycles outside of halt state) with a
mask of 0x00 (No unit mask) count 100000
samples % symbol name
138991 14.0627 acpi_pm_read
52401 5.3018 tcp_v4_rcv
48466 4.9037 nf_iterate
38043 3.8491 __slab_alloc
34155 3.4557 ip_send_reply
20963 2.1210 ip_rcv
19475 1.9704 csum_partial
19084 1.9309 kfree
17434 1.7639 ip_output
17278 1.7481 netif_receive_skb
15248 1.5428 nf_hook_slow
My .config is at http://www.nuclearcat.com/.config (there is SPARSEMEM
enabled, it doesn't make any noticeable difference)
Please CC me on reply, i am not in list.
Could you try with SLUB but disabling CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG ?
--
Denys Fedoryshchenko
Technical Manager
Virtual ISP S.A.L.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- 2.6.21 -> 2.6.22 & 2.6.23-rc8 performance regression
- From: Denys
- Re: 2.6.21 -> 2.6.22 & 2.6.23-rc8 performance regression
- From: Eric Dumazet
- 2.6.21 -> 2.6.22 & 2.6.23-rc8 performance regression
- Prev by Date: Re: sata_sil24 broken since 2.6.23-rc4-mm1
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] (repost) Fix SMP poweroff hangs
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.21 -> 2.6.22 & 2.6.23-rc8 performance regression
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.21 -> 2.6.22 & 2.6.23-rc8 performance regression
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|