Re: [PATCH -mm] IrCOMM discovery indication simplification
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 14:23:43 -0700
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 02:29:51 +0300
Samuel Ortiz <samuel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Every IrCOMM socket is registered with the discovery subsystem, so we don't
need to loop over all of them for every discovery event. We just need to
do it for the registered IrCOMM socket.
Would you please consider this patch for -mm inclusion ?
Sure. I don't merge ircomm patches directly so I added this to my
to-send-to-davem queue.
From: Ryan Reading <ryanr23@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <samuel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Please put the From: right at the start of the changelog, not at the end
like this, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH -mm] IrCOMM discovery indication simplification
- From: Samuel Ortiz
- [PATCH -mm] IrCOMM discovery indication simplification
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm] intel-iommu sg chaining support
- Next by Date: Re: pgd_none_or_clear_bad strangeness?
- Previous by thread: [PATCH -mm] IrCOMM discovery indication simplification
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] robust futex thread exit race
- Index(es):