Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:02:17 -0400
How do you simulate reading 100TB of data spread across 3000 disks,
selecting 10% of it using some criterion, then sorting and
summarizing the result?
You repeatedly read zeros from a smaller disk into the same amount of
memory, and sort that as if it were real data instead.
You're not thinking outside of the box, and you need to do that to
write good test cases and fix kernel bugs effectively.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
- From: Chuck Ebbert
- Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
- References:
- Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
- From: Matthew Wilcox
- Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
- From: David Miller
- Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
- From: Chuck Ebbert
- Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
- Prev by Date: [PATCH for testing] Re: Decreasing stime running confuses top
- Next by Date: Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
- Previous by thread: Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
- Next by thread: Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|