Re: [PATCH 1/3] dma: add dma_flags_set/get_*() interfaces
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:10:54 -0700
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 09:03:27 -0700
akepner@xxxxxxx wrote:
What would be the cost of doing this cleanly and either redefining
dma_data_direction to be a field-of-bits or just leave dma_data_direction
alone (it is quite unrelated to this work, isn't it?) and adding new
fields/arguments to manage this new functionality?
It'd be significantly more work to do change or add arguments
to the dma_map_* functions. But if that's what I need to do to
get this accepted, I'll back up and have another go at it.
I don't have any particularly strong opinions on which would be the best
way to clean this up. Hopefully someone who is more involved with the DMA
mapping interfaces can help out.
It wouldn't be efficient for you to implement something new, only to have
it criticized again. I'd suggest that you come up with a concrete
design, describe to us what you propose to do and let's take it from there.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 1/3] dma: add dma_flags_set/get_*() interfaces
- From: akepner
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] dma: add dma_flags_set/get_*() interfaces
- From: Andrew Morton
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] dma: add dma_flags_set/get_*() interfaces
- From: akepner
- [PATCH 1/3] dma: add dma_flags_set/get_*() interfaces
- Prev by Date: Re: VIA VT6307 OHCI version?
- Next by Date: Re: [bug] ata subsystem related crash with latest -git
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dma: add dma_flags_set/get_*() interfaces
- Next by thread: [PATCH 2/3] dma: redefine dma_flags_set/get_*() for sn-ia64
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|