Re: [RFC, PATCH] locks: remove posix deadlock detection
- From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:27:32 -0600
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 01:43:21PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
We currently attempt to return -EDEALK to blocking fcntl() file locking
requests that would create a cycle in the graph of tasks waiting on
locks.
This is inefficient: in the general case it requires us determining
whether we're adding a cycle to an arbitrary directed acyclic graph.
And this calculation has to be performed while holding a lock (currently
the BKL) that prevents that graph from changing.
It has historically been a source of bugs; most recently it was noticed
that it could loop indefinitely while holding the BKL.
It can also return -EDEADLK spuriously. So yeah, just kill it.
--
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC, PATCH] locks: remove posix deadlock detection
- From: Alan Cox
- Re: [RFC, PATCH] locks: remove posix deadlock detection
- References:
- [RFC][PATCH] Fix hang in posix_locks_deadlock()
- From: George G. Davis
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Fix hang in posix_locks_deadlock()
- From: George G. Davis
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Fix hang in posix_locks_deadlock()
- From: J. Bruce Fields
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Fix hang in posix_locks_deadlock()
- From: J. Bruce Fields
- [PATCH] locks: fix possible infinite loop in posix deadlock detection
- From: J. Bruce Fields
- [RFC, PATCH] locks: remove posix deadlock detection
- From: J. Bruce Fields
- [RFC][PATCH] Fix hang in posix_locks_deadlock()
- Prev by Date: Re: struct user . u_ar0
- Next by Date: Re: USB_SUSPEND needs SUSPEND?
- Previous by thread: [RFC, PATCH] locks: remove posix deadlock detection
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC, PATCH] locks: remove posix deadlock detection
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|