Re: [RFC, PATCH] locks: remove posix deadlock detection
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 18:40:52 +0000
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:27:32 -0600
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 01:43:21PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
We currently attempt to return -EDEALK to blocking fcntl() file locking
requests that would create a cycle in the graph of tasks waiting on
locks.
This is inefficient: in the general case it requires us determining
whether we're adding a cycle to an arbitrary directed acyclic graph.
And this calculation has to be performed while holding a lock (currently
the BKL) that prevents that graph from changing.
It has historically been a source of bugs; most recently it was noticed
that it could loop indefinitely while holding the BKL.
It can also return -EDEADLK spuriously. So yeah, just kill it.
NAK. This is an ABI change. It was also comprehensively rejected before
because
- EDEADLK behaviour is ABI
- EDEADLK behaviour is required by SuSv3
- We have no idea what applications may rely on this behaviour.
and also SuSv3 is required by LSB
See the thread
http://osdir.com/ml/file-systems/2004-06/msg00017.html
so we need to fix the bugs - the lock usage and the looping. At that
point it merely becomes a performance concern to those who use it, which
is the proper behaviour. If you want a faster non-checking one use
flock(), or add another flag that is a Linux "don't check for deadlock"
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC, PATCH] locks: remove posix deadlock detection
- From: J. Bruce Fields
- Re: [RFC, PATCH] locks: remove posix deadlock detection
- From: Matthew Wilcox
- Re: [RFC, PATCH] locks: remove posix deadlock detection
- References:
- [RFC][PATCH] Fix hang in posix_locks_deadlock()
- From: George G. Davis
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Fix hang in posix_locks_deadlock()
- From: George G. Davis
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Fix hang in posix_locks_deadlock()
- From: J. Bruce Fields
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Fix hang in posix_locks_deadlock()
- From: J. Bruce Fields
- [PATCH] locks: fix possible infinite loop in posix deadlock detection
- From: J. Bruce Fields
- [RFC, PATCH] locks: remove posix deadlock detection
- From: J. Bruce Fields
- Re: [RFC, PATCH] locks: remove posix deadlock detection
- From: Matthew Wilcox
- [RFC][PATCH] Fix hang in posix_locks_deadlock()
- Prev by Date: Re: Major SATA / EXT3 Issue?
- Next by Date: Re: PCMCIA insert on resume
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC, PATCH] locks: remove posix deadlock detection
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC, PATCH] locks: remove posix deadlock detection
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|