Re: [PATCH] slub: nr_slabs is an atomic_long_t
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:24:30 +1100
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:53:55 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx> wrote:
That was already fixed AFAICT.
Not in Linus' tree, yet.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgp8f01WcTbEM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] slub: nr_slabs is an atomic_long_t
- From: Olof Johansson
- Re: [PATCH] slub: nr_slabs is an atomic_long_t
- References:
- [PATCH] slub: nr_slabs is an atomic_long_t
- From: Stephen Rothwell
- Re: [PATCH] slub: nr_slabs is an atomic_long_t
- From: Christoph Lameter
- [PATCH] slub: nr_slabs is an atomic_long_t
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC, PATCH] locks: remove posix deadlock detection
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 08/10] SLUB: Optional fast path using cmpxchg_local
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] slub: nr_slabs is an atomic_long_t
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] slub: nr_slabs is an atomic_long_t
- Index(es):
