Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:58:24 -0800 (PST)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:49:16 -0800
Do you believe that our response to bug reports is adequate?
Do you feel that making us feel and look like *** helps?
I guess I'm just masterbating here all night long with the 46
bug fixes I've reviewed fully and queued up into my tree. Along
with all the 10 or so -stable submissions I did tonight as well.
When someone like me is bug fixing full time, I take massive offense
to the impression you're trying to give especially when it's directed
at the networking.
So turn it down a notch Andrew.
I bet if you did things like list explicitly by name every single
person who adds a bug fix (however trivial) to an -mm release instead
of a new feature, you'll better achieve your goal than what you're
doing here.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
- From: Andrew Morton
- Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
- References:
- Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
- From: Andrew Morton
- Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
- From: David Miller
- Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
- From: Andrew Morton
- Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
- Prev by Date: Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
- Next by Date: Re: x86 merge: Keep kernel/cpu for CPU specific code?
- Previous by thread: Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
- Next by thread: Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
- Index(es):