Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
- From: Jörn Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:33:58 +0100
On Tue, 13 November 2007 15:18:07 -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
I just find it weird that something can be known broken for several -rc*
kernels before I happen to install it, discover it's broken on my own
machine,
and then I track it down, fix it, and submit the patch, generally all
within a
couple of hours. Where the heck was the dude(ess) that broke it ?? AWOL.
And when I receive hostility from the "maintainers" of said code for fixing
their bugs, well.. that really motivates me to continue reporting new ones..
Given a decent bug report, I agree that having the bug not looked at is
shameful. But what can a developer do if a bug report effectively reads
"there is some bug somewhere in recent kernels"? How can I know that in
this particular case it is my bug that I introduced? It could just as
easily be 50 other people and none of them are eager to debug it unless
they suspect it to be their bug.
This is a common problem and fairly unrelated to linux in general or the
kernel in particular. Who is going to be the sucker that figures out
which developer the bug belongs to? And I have yet to find a project,
commercial or opensource, where volunteers flock to become such a
sucker.
One option is to push this role to the bug reporter. Another is to
strong-arm some developers into this role, by whatever means. A third
would be for $LARGE_COMPANY to hire some people. If you have a better
idea or would volunteer your time, I'd be grateful. Simply blaming one
side, whether bug reporter or a random developer, for not being the
sucker doesn't help anyone.
Jörn
--
Joern's library part 2:
http://www.art.net/~hopkins/Don/unix-haters/tirix/embarrassing-memo.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
- From: Mark Lord
- Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
- From: Andrew Morton
- Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
- References:
- Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
- From: Andrew Morton
- Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
- From: David Miller
- Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
- From: Andrew Morton
- Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
- From: David Miller
- Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
- From: Andrew Morton
- Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
- From: Mark Lord
- Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
- From: Russell King
- Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
- From: Mark Lord
- Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drivers/i2c: Drop redundant includes of moduleparam.h
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 01/28] cpu alloc: The allocator
- Previous by thread: Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
- Next by thread: Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|