Re: Fw: Re: [PATCH 1/3] signal(i386): alternative signal stack wraparound occurs
- From: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:07:58 -0800 (PST)
thanks Roland for the detailed analysis. I've queued up the patch below
in the x86 tree. I suspect we can wait with this for v2.6.25, due to
this being long-standing behavior of Linux? Thus we could observe the
effects of this patch for a longer time.
It's certainly nothing new. The failure mode of concern is only for a
buggy program to fail to crash as quickly and gracefully as it might.
Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: Fw: Re: [PATCH 1/3] signal(i386): alternative signal stack wraparound occurs
- From: Roland McGrath
- Re: Fw: Re: [PATCH 1/3] signal(i386): alternative signal stack wraparound occurs
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: Fw: Re: [PATCH 1/3] signal(i386): alternative signal stack wraparound occurs
- Prev by Date: [SKY2] Problems (2.6.24-rc3-git1)
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] New kobject/kset/ktype documentation and example code
- Previous by thread: Re: Fw: Re: [PATCH 1/3] signal(i386): alternative signal stack wraparound occurs
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] signal(i386): alternative signal stack wraparound occurs
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|