Re: [patch/rfc 2/4] pcf875x I2C GPIO expander driver
- From: Bill Gatliff <bgat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:04:10 -0600
Jean Delvare wrote:
!!(value & (1 << offset))
is more efficiently written
(value >> offset) & 1
... but not more efficiently implemented.
Your version requires code to do the shift on live data at runtime. David's version lets the compiler create the mask once, at compile-time.
b.g.
--
Bill Gatliff
bgat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch/rfc 2/4] pcf875x I2C GPIO expander driver
- From: Jean Delvare
- Re: [patch/rfc 2/4] pcf875x I2C GPIO expander driver
- References:
- Re: [patch/rfc 2/4] pcf875x I2C GPIO expander driver
- From: Jean Delvare
- Re: [patch/rfc 2/4] pcf875x I2C GPIO expander driver
- Prev by Date: Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory) (fwd)
- Next by Date: Re: Possibly SATA related freeze killed networking and RAID
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch/rfc 2/4] pcf875x I2C GPIO expander driver
- Next by thread: Re: [patch/rfc 2/4] pcf875x I2C GPIO expander driver
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|