Re: [patch/rfc 2/4] pcf875x I2C GPIO expander driver
- From: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:36:54 +0100
Hi Bill,
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:04:10 -0600, Bill Gatliff wrote:
Jean Delvare wrote:
!!(value & (1 << offset))
is more efficiently written
(value >> offset) & 1
... but not more efficiently implemented.
Your version requires code to do the shift on live data at runtime.
David's version lets the compiler create the mask once, at compile-time.
I don't understand. How could the compiler create the mask at
compile-time when "offset" is only known at runtime?
Anyway, I just checked and gcc (4.1.2 on x86_86) generates the same
code for both expressions, so there's not much to argue about. David,
feel free to ignore my comment if you prefer your implementation :)
--
Jean Delvare
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch/rfc 2/4] pcf875x I2C GPIO expander driver
- From: Bill Gatliff
- Re: [patch/rfc 2/4] pcf875x I2C GPIO expander driver
- References:
- Re: [patch/rfc 2/4] pcf875x I2C GPIO expander driver
- From: Jean Delvare
- Re: [patch/rfc 2/4] pcf875x I2C GPIO expander driver
- From: Bill Gatliff
- Re: [patch/rfc 2/4] pcf875x I2C GPIO expander driver
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3 x86 make depends on s390 arch
- Next by Date: Re: Out of tree module using LSM
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch/rfc 2/4] pcf875x I2C GPIO expander driver
- Next by thread: Re: [patch/rfc 2/4] pcf875x I2C GPIO expander driver
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|