Re: [PATCH 9/9] MN10300: Fix MTD JEDEC probe so that the ASB2303 bootprom can be detected [2.6.24-rc3-mm2]
- From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:06:33 +0000
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 14:01 +0000, David Howells wrote:
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't like this -- it shouldn't be necessary.
Actually, I think you're right. I think the problem is that:
if (uaddr != MTD_UADDR_NOT_SUPPORTED ) {
/* ASSERT("The unlock addresses for non-8-bit mode
are bollocks. We don't really need an array."); */
uaddr = finfo->uaddr[0];
}
Should be:
if (uaddr == MTD_UADDR_NOT_SUPPORTED ) {
/* ASSERT("The unlock addresses for non-8-bit mode
are bollocks. We don't really need an array."); */
uaddr = finfo->uaddr[0];
}
Nah, it does what it's supposed to. Really, the only information in the
uaddr[] array is the information about what widths are supported, and
the _first_ unlock address is the only one we should care about.
It should change to a bitmask for the widths which are supported, and a
single int for the uaddr.
Otherwise the finfo->uaddr[] table is useless because only the first row will
be used, except for unsupported configurations where uaddr will be set to
MTD_UADDR_NOT_SUPPORTED.
That is basically the assertion being made, yes. And it's true -- which
is why I didn't want you removing it ;)
With the ASB2303 bootprom I need to use the second row because it's in the x16
configuration, *not* the x8.
No, you need to use the second row because the first row is incorrect.
It ought to contain what's in the second row. :)
--
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 9/9] MN10300: Fix MTD JEDEC probe so that the ASB2303 bootprom can be detected [2.6.24-rc3-mm2]
- From: David Woodhouse
- [PATCH 1/9] AOUT: Move STACK_TOP[_MAX] to asm/processor.h [2.6.24-rc3-mm2]
- From: David Howells
- [PATCH 9/9] MN10300: Fix MTD JEDEC probe so that the ASB2303 bootprom can be detected [2.6.24-rc3-mm2]
- From: David Howells
- Re: [PATCH 9/9] MN10300: Fix MTD JEDEC probe so that the ASB2303 bootprom can be detected [2.6.24-rc3-mm2]
- From: David Howells
- Re: [PATCH 9/9] MN10300: Fix MTD JEDEC probe so that the ASB2303 bootprom can be detected [2.6.24-rc3-mm2]
- Prev by Date: Re: Kernel Development & Objective-C
- Next by Date: git + checkpatch.pl?
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 9/9] MN10300: Fix MTD JEDEC probe so that the ASB2303 bootprom can be detected [2.6.24-rc3-mm2]
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 9/9] MN10300: Fix MTD JEDEC probe so that the ASB2303 bootprom can be detected [2.6.24-rc3-mm2]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|