Re: 2.6.23: does it supposed to work on an i486?
- From: "Gerb Stralko" <gerb.stralko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:20:24 -0500
Well, I applied the patch (in 2.6.23 it's
arch/i386/boot/pmjump.S,
not
arch/x86/boot/pmjump.S,
but that's minor) - still the same behavior, it still reboots
instantly right when bootloader gave control to the kernel.
So it must be something else.. ;)
It should be x86, they merged the i386 and x86_64 code into one arch
called x86. Try it again and see if it works
Thanks,
- Jerry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- 2.6.23: does it supposed to work on an i486?
- From: Michael Tokarev
- Re: 2.6.23: does it supposed to work on an i486?
- From: H. Peter Anvin
- Re: 2.6.23: does it supposed to work on an i486?
- From: Michael Tokarev
- 2.6.23: does it supposed to work on an i486?
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/4, v3] Physical PCI slot objects
- Next by Date: VMware on 2.6.34: patches to enable vmmon and vmet to build/run
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.23: does it supposed to work on an i486?
- Next by thread: [PATCH] 2.6.24: restore missing sysfs max_cstate attr
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
