Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops
- From: Paul Rolland <rol@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:32:24 +0100
Hello,
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:16:01 +0100
Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11-12-07 13:08, David Newall wrote:
Rene Herman wrote:
(*) some local testing shows it to be almost exactly that for both out and
in on my own PC -- a little over. If anyone cares, see attached little test
program. The "little over" I don't worry about. 0 us delay is also fine for
me and if any code was _that_ fragile it would have broken long ago.
Some results :
Core 2Duo 1.73GHz :
[root@tux tmp]# ./in
out = 2366
in = 2496
[root@tux tmp]# ./in
out = 3094
in = 2379
Plain old PIII 600 MHz:
[root@www-dev /tmp]# ./in
out = 314
in = 543
[root@www-dev /tmp]# ./in
out = 319
in = 538
[root@www-dev /tmp]# ./in
out = 319
in = 550
[root@www-dev /tmp]# ./in
out = 329
in = 531
Opteron 150 2.4GHz :
-bash-3.1# ./in
out = 4801
in = 4863
-bash-3.1# ./in
out = 5041
in = 4909
-bash-3.1# ./in
out = 4829
in = 4886
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops
- From: David P. Reed
- Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops
- From: Andi Kleen
- Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops
- From: Alan Cox
- Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops
- From: Pavel Machek
- Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops
- From: Andi Kleen
- Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops
- From: Pavel Machek
- Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops
- From: Rene Herman
- Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops
- From: Krzysztof Halasa
- Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops
- From: David Newall
- Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops
- From: H. Peter Anvin
- Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops
- From: David Newall
- Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops
- From: Paul Rolland
- Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops
- From: Rene Herman
- Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops
- From: David Newall
- Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops
- From: Rene Herman
- RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops
- Prev by Date: Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops
- Next by Date: Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync
- Previous by thread: Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops
- Next by thread: Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops
- Index(es):