Re: [patch 14/24] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:56:30 -0800
This patch is modified by another patch in the sequence. This feels needlessly confusing when reviewing (especially since the comment doesn't look to match the code, e.g. w.r.t to "Q" and "R" constraints); can you reorder the patchset to avoid that?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 14/24] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers
- Re: [patch 14/24] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
- References:
- [patch 00/24] Markers use immediate values, for 2.6.24-rc5-mm1
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers
- [patch 14/24] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers
- [patch 00/24] Markers use immediate values, for 2.6.24-rc5-mm1
- Prev by Date: patch pci-remove-users-of-pci_enable_device_bars.patch added to gregkh-2.6 tree
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/10] sysfs network namespace support
- Previous by thread: [patch 14/24] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 14/24] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|