Re: Trailing periods in kernel messages
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:12:55 -0800 (PST)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:15:32 -0800
No-period is a kernel idiom, produces perfectly readable output, I have
never ever heard of anyone expressing the least concern over a lack of dots
at the end of their printks and 91% of kernel code agrees.
I have never heard of a compiler expressing the least concern over
whitespace and other aspects of coding style.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: Trailing periods in kernel messages
- From: Alan Cox
- Re: Trailing periods in kernel messages
- From: Frans Pop
- Re: Trailing periods in kernel messages
- From: Andrew Morton
- Re: Trailing periods in kernel messages
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/10] sysfs network namespace support
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags
- Previous by thread: Re: Trailing periods in kernel messages
- Next by thread: Re: Trailing periods in kernel messages
- Index(es):