Re: [RFC] sleepy linux
- From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 18:28:04 +0100
Am Mittwoch, 26. Dezember 2007 00:07:31 schrieb Pavel Machek:
Heute 00:07:31
This is RFC. It does not even work for me... it sleeps but it will not
wake up, because SATA wakeup code is missing. Code attached for illustration.
I wonder if this is the right approach? What is right interface to the
drivers?
IMHO you are making to many special cases. The system can be "sleepy"
if all devices can be runtime suspended and all CPUs are idle.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] sleepy linux
- From: Pavel Machek
- Re: [RFC] sleepy linux
- From: Pavel Machek
- Re: [RFC] sleepy linux
- References:
- [RFC] sleepy linux
- From: Pavel Machek
- [RFC] sleepy linux
- Prev by Date: Re: list corruption on ib_srp load in v2.6.24-rc5
- Next by Date: Re: [x86] is checkpatch.pl broken
- Previous by thread: [RFC] sleepy linux
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] sleepy linux
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
