Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:01:40 +0000
I'd say the practical advantage to the user would be almost zero.
Which distribution is going to enable this option and defacto
banning external modules?
It would be a real nuisance for developing code let alone for using it.
The entries are currently far bigger than is needed and fixing that would
be much more productive.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
- From: Torsten Kaiser
- Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
- References:
- [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
- From: Bodo Eggert
- Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
- From: Adrian Bunk
- Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
- From: Torsten Kaiser
- Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
- From: Michael Buesch
- [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
- Next by Date: Re: Recursive variable `KBUILD_CFLAGS' references itself (eventually).
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
- Index(es):