Re: asm-x86/msr.h for sanitized headers: clean it or punt it
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:36:35 +0100
can you enumerate which functions need to actually go to userspace then ? therdtscl/rdtscll/rdpmc primarily
__KERNEL__ markings are a crapshoot at the moment. you must also be jumping
through hoops in order to use the header in the first place since the vanilla
one wont compile out of the box.
At least the 64bit one or older 32bit one works without hoops. Agreed that the
paravirt changes destroyed it on newer 32bit though. That's an unfortunate
regression.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: asm-x86/msr.h for sanitized headers: clean it or punt it
- From: Mike Frysinger
- Re: asm-x86/msr.h for sanitized headers: clean it or punt it
- References:
- asm-x86/msr.h for sanitized headers: clean it or punt it
- From: Mike Frysinger
- Re: asm-x86/msr.h for sanitized headers: clean it or punt it
- From: Andi Kleen
- Re: asm-x86/msr.h for sanitized headers: clean it or punt it
- From: Mike Frysinger
- asm-x86/msr.h for sanitized headers: clean it or punt it
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] sh: sh7712 clock support
- Next by Date: Re: kexec refuses to boot latest -mm
- Previous by thread: Re: asm-x86/msr.h for sanitized headers: clean it or punt it
- Next by thread: Re: asm-x86/msr.h for sanitized headers: clean it or punt it
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|