Re: [RFC][PATCH] byteorder: introduce le32_add_cpu & friends to core

On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 09:17:32AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
be32_add is shorter than be32_add_cpu but I think it's not clear
whether second parameter is in native byte order or not.

Then again adding foreing endian values doesn't make much sense.

If you insist on your naming please make sure to convert ocfs and xfs
to your naming.

Personally, I'd rather stick with the (IMHO) more descriptive name - btw,
the ones he picked don't require any extra conversion in Ocfs2.
--Mark

--
Mark Fasheh
Principal Software Developer, Oracle
mark.fasheh@xxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/