Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in

From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 23:20:40 +0100 (CET)

On Dec 31 2007 18:43, Patrick Mau wrote:

May I ask something that might be obvious for most of the
development community:

Modules have to be loaded in seperate pages, right ?

That seems to be the case, judging from /proc/modules always ending in 000,
meaning each module is aligned at 0x1000 (4096, a page on i386).

Additionally, it looks like 48% of all kernel symbols (from System.map)
are aligned to 16 byte boundaries (what a waste! ;-))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
  - From: Bodo Eggert
- Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
  - From: Adrian Bunk
- Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
  - From: Bodo Eggert
- Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
  - From: Adrian Bunk
- Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
  - From: Bodo Eggert
- Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
  - From: Jan Engelhardt
- Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
  - From: Patrick Mau

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] configfs: dir.c fix possible recursive locking
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm] crypto: scatterwalk.h needs sched.h
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread