Re: [PATCH x86] [5/16] Replace hard coded reservations in x86-64 early boot code with dynamic table II
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 13:38:07 +0100
On Friday 04 January 2008 10:00:52 Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On x86-64 there are several memory allocations before bootmem. To
avoid them stomping on each other they used to be all hard coded in
bad_area(). Replace this with an array that is filled as needed.
This cleans up the code considerably and allows to expand its use.
this code introduces a number of style errors that make the code harder
to read and follow. Please fix them.
I reviewed the code now and I honestly don't see any "style errors" so I don't
know how to change it.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: isofs oops - d_splice_alias+0x1f (2.6.24-rc5-mm1)
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH x86] [5/16] Replace hard coded reservations in x86-64 early boot code with dynamic table
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH x86] [5/16] Replace hard coded reservations in x86-64 early boot code with dynamic table
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH x86] [5/16] Replace hard coded reservations in x86-64 early boot code with dynamic table II
- Index(es):