Re: [JANITOR PROPOSAL] Switch ioctl functions to ->unlocked_ioctl
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 20:18:43 +0100
Thanks, Andi! I think it'd very useful change.
Reminds me this is something that should be actually flagged
in checkpatch.pl too
Andy, it would be good if checkpatch.pl complained about .ioctl =
as opposed to .unlocked_ioctl = ...
Also perhaps if a whole new file_operations with a ioctl is added
complain about missing compat_ioctl as a low prioritity warning?
(might be ok if it's architecture specific on architectures without
compat layer)
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [JANITOR PROPOSAL] Switch ioctl functions to ->unlocked_ioctl
- From: Arnd Bergmann
- Re: [JANITOR PROPOSAL] Switch ioctl functions to ->unlocked_ioctl
- References:
- [JANITOR PROPOSAL] Switch ioctl functions to ->unlocked_ioctl
- From: Andi Kleen
- Re: [JANITOR PROPOSAL] Switch ioctl functions to ->unlocked_ioctl
- From: Alexey Dobriyan
- [JANITOR PROPOSAL] Switch ioctl functions to ->unlocked_ioctl
- Prev by Date: Re: [linux-kernel] Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override.
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 3/9] unprivileged mounts: account user mounts
- Previous by thread: Re: [JANITOR PROPOSAL] Switch ioctl functions to ->unlocked_ioctl
- Next by thread: Re: [JANITOR PROPOSAL] Switch ioctl functions to ->unlocked_ioctl
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|