RE: [patch] split MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA
- From: "Cai, Cliff" <Cliff.Cai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:21:40 +0800
Hi,all
I'd like to say something about this issue.
Currently,the blackfin on chip SD host ONLY support 1-bit MMC while
support 1-bit/4-bit SD/SDIO.
And we want our driver to support both 1-bit MMC and 4-bit SD/SDIO.but
the current MMC driver framework
Only allow us to set one kind of bus width,either 1-bit or 4-bit.So in
order to meet our case,we need more flexible mechanism
To inform the upper commom driver to know our situation.
Cliff
-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan Wu [mailto:cooloney.lkml@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 10:33 AM
To: Pierre Ossman; cliff.cai@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Mike Frysinger; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [patch] split MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA
On Jan 9, 2008 4:49 AM, Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:40:49 -0500dont do hardware.
Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
i dont understand what's confusing. the Blackfin on chip host
controller only supports 1-bit MMC, but it supports 4-bit SD/SDIO.
this is a fact. while it may be a stupid decision, it is what it
is, and i need the framework made more flexible in order to get the
Blackfin driver merged cleanly. we do software for hardware, we
4-bit SD, "support" in this case must me "vendor will guarantee it
Well, since I've seen no _hardware_ differences between 4-bit MMC and
works". And that is not the kind of "support" that needs a distinction
in the code.
4-bit MMC and 4-bit SD then please elaborate as it is my understanding
So, again, if you feel that there is a hardware difference between
that they are identical.
As Mike said, the reason split this flag is because Blackfin on-chip
SDIO controller's limitation.
Cliff is working on it for a long time, so I dropped him in. Hope he can
clarify the confusing things.
Thanks
-Bryan Wu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] split MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA
- From: Pierre Ossman
- Re: [patch] split MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA
- References:
- Re: [patch] split MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA
- From: Bryan Wu
- Re: [patch] split MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Revert "x86: optimize page faults like all other achitectures and kill notifier cruft"
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] split MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] split MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|