Re: [PATCH 3/6] NLM: Initialize completion variable in lockd_up
- From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:12:03 -0500
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 06:17:43PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Btw, lockd() takes BKL just after starting up and only implicitly drops
it when blocking. This seems very dangerous to me and badly wants
updating to some real locking scheme..
Yep.
--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 0/6] Intro: convert lockd to kthread and fix use-after-free (try #6)
- From: Jeff Layton
- [PATCH 1/6] SUNRPC: spin svc_rqst initialization to its own function
- From: Jeff Layton
- [PATCH 2/6] SUNRPC: export svc_sock_update_bufs
- From: Jeff Layton
- [PATCH 3/6] NLM: Initialize completion variable in lockd_up
- From: Jeff Layton
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] NLM: Initialize completion variable in lockd_up
- From: Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] NLM: Initialize completion variable in lockd_up
- From: Jeff Layton
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] NLM: Initialize completion variable in lockd_up
- From: Christoph Hellwig
- [PATCH 0/6] Intro: convert lockd to kthread and fix use-after-free (try #6)
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Implement module aliasing for i2c to translate from device tree names
- Next by Date: Re: possible recursive locking, 2.6.24-rc7
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/6] NLM: Initialize completion variable in lockd_up
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/6] NLM: Initialize completion variable in lockd_up
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
