Re: [PATCH -v6 2/2] Updating ctime and mtime for memory-mapped files
- From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:36:08 +0100
Possibly, I didn't see a quick way to break that iteration.
From a quick glance at prio_tree.c the iterator isn't valid anymoreafter releasing i_mmap_lock. Fixing that would be,.. 'fun'.
Maybe i_mmap_lock isn't needed at all, since msync holds mmap_sem,
which protects the prio tree as well, no?
I also realized I forgot to copy/paste the prio_tree_iter declaration
and ought to make all these functions static.
But for a quick draft it conveys the idea pretty well, I guess :-)
Yes :)
There could also be nasty performance corner cases, like having a huge
file mapped thousands of times, and having only a couple of pages
dirtied between MS_ASYNC invocations. Then most of that page table
walking would be just unnecessary overhead.
There's something to be said for walking only the dirty pages, and
doing page_mkclean on them, even if in some cases that would be
slower.
But I have a strong feeling of deja vu, and last time it ended with
Andrew not liking the whole thing...
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH -v6 0/2] Fixing the issue with memory-mapped file times
- From: Anton Salikhmetov
- [PATCH -v6 2/2] Updating ctime and mtime for memory-mapped files
- From: Anton Salikhmetov
- Re: [PATCH -v6 2/2] Updating ctime and mtime for memory-mapped files
- From: Miklos Szeredi
- Re: [PATCH -v6 2/2] Updating ctime and mtime for memory-mapped files
- From: Peter Zijlstra
- Re: [PATCH -v6 2/2] Updating ctime and mtime for memory-mapped files
- From: Miklos Szeredi
- Re: [PATCH -v6 2/2] Updating ctime and mtime for memory-mapped files
- From: Peter Zijlstra
- Re: [PATCH -v6 2/2] Updating ctime and mtime for memory-mapped files
- From: Miklos Szeredi
- Re: [PATCH -v6 2/2] Updating ctime and mtime for memory-mapped files
- From: Peter Zijlstra
- [PATCH -v6 0/2] Fixing the issue with memory-mapped file times
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] printk deadlocks if called with runqueue lock held
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] update checkpatch.pl to version 0.13
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH -v6 2/2] Updating ctime and mtime for memory-mapped files
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH -v6 0/2] Fixing the issue with memory-mapped file times
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|