Re: epoll and shared fd's
- From: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:40:01 +0100
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 09:10:18PM +0000, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Hi,
I just came across a strange behavior of epoll that seems to
contradict the documentation. Here is what happens:
* I have two processes P1 and P2, P1 accept()s connections, and send the
resulting file descriptors to P2 through a unix socket.
* P2 registers the received socket in his epollfd.
[time passes]
* P2 is done with the socket and closes it
* P2 gets events for the socket again !
Though the documentation says that if a process closes a file
descriptor, it gets unregistered. And yes I'm sure that P2 doens't dup()
the file descriptor. Though (because of a bug) it was still open in
P1[0], hence the referenced socket still live at the kernel level.
Of course the userland workaround is to force the EPOLL_CTL_DEL before
the close, which I now do, but costs me a syscall where I wanted to
spare one :|
For epoll, a close is when the kernel file* is released (that is, when all
its instances are gone).
We could put a special handling in filp_close(), but I don't think is a
good idea, and we're better live with the current behaviour.
Okay, maybe updating the linux manpages to be more clear about that is
the way to go then. Thanks
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O madcoder@xxxxxxxxxx
OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgpPzwgNLhDxm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: epoll and shared fd's
- From: Davide Libenzi
- Re: epoll and shared fd's
- References:
- epoll and shared fd's
- From: Pierre Habouzit
- Re: epoll and shared fd's
- From: Davide Libenzi
- epoll and shared fd's
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] USB: Use menuconfig objects
- Next by Date: strex instrucion question in v6_early_abort
- Previous by thread: Re: epoll and shared fd's
- Next by thread: Re: epoll and shared fd's
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|