Re: x86: Why have __copy_from_user_ll_nocache* been exported?
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:05:29 -0800
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:14:30 +0200
Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
A commit that does nothing except for adding two unused EXPORT_SYMBOL's.
Without any rationale why they should be exported.
Don't look at me. This has been sitting in my tree for nearly two years as
part of the reiser4 patchset. It may not even be needed any more. I guess
Ingo went on a fishing expedition and liked the change.
And that from a person who on the other hand wants to introduce
(and tries to force on other people) deprecation periods for unused
EXPORT_SYMBOL's.
For very good reasons which you perversely and persistently ignore.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: x86: Why have __copy_from_user_ll_nocache* been exported?
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: x86: Why have __copy_from_user_ll_nocache* been exported?
- References:
- x86: Why have __copy_from_user_ll_nocache* been exported?
- From: Adrian Bunk
- x86: Why have __copy_from_user_ll_nocache* been exported?
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: make bootmap_start page align v6
- Next by Date: [PATCH] nozomi: constify driver
- Previous by thread: Re: x86: Why have __copy_from_user_ll_nocache* been exported?
- Next by thread: Re: x86: Why have __copy_from_user_ll_nocache* been exported?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|