Re: [PATCH] x86: define OBJCOPYFLAGS explicitly for each target.
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:45:05 +0100
* Ian Campbell <ijc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Do this rather than defining a global version and overriding it in
almost all cases in order to make subsequent patches simpler.
thanks Ian - i've picked up #1, #2 and #4 from your series. Once #3 is
OK to Peter i'll add that too. (#4, the bumping of the version needs
#3 to be meaningful.)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] x86: define OBJCOPYFLAGS explicitly for each target.
- From: Ian Campbell
- [PATCH] x86: define OBJCOPYFLAGS explicitly for each target.
- Prev by Date: Re: degrading performance (NFS v.3 client)
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.24 regression: pan hanging unkilleable and un-straceable
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86: add a crc32 checksum to the kernel image.
- Next by thread: [git pull] scheduler updates
- Index(es):